Sorry, I need a new pair of glasses.  That should have been 9,600,  
not 9.600.
Dave

On Jun 15, 2010, at 2:10 PM, David Trippel wrote:

> I'm not sure, but it's gotta be at least as much as the  
> concentration in Warsteiner Fresh NA beer (0.002%).  I'd have to  
> drink 9.600 bottles of it in order to get the same buzz from one  
> six pack of 3.2 beer.
>
> Dave
>
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Ambler, Charles wrote:
>
>> Is it not true that alcohol occurs "naturally" in fruit juices,  
>> etc.?  what would those percentages be?  Chuck Ambler
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Alcohol and Drugs History Society [[log in to unmask]]  
>> On Behalf Of Dan Malleck [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:13 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 3.2 beer
>>
>> How do they come up with these numbers?
>>
>> In Ontario, during prohibition anything under 2% Proof was  
>> considered non intoxicating until 1923, when they upped it to  
>> 4.4%--a convenient illusion, I guess.  Workers still didn't like  
>> the beer; called it "Fergie's Foam" in "honour "of provincial  
>> Premier Ferguson.
>>
>>
>> Robin, by 2.2% do you mean Proof or ABV? Or ABW?
>>
>> Dan