CLEANACCESS Archives

October 2008

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nancy Watson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:57:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
We are deploying the Cisco NAC, inband, real-ip gateway to replace our 
Bluesocket solution for authentication.  The plan is to use the HA-CAS 
as the dhcp servers and configuring upwards in the 100's of vlans on the 
box for our LWAPP access points. 

Does anyone know of any issues using the NAC servers as the dhcp server 
versus an external dhcp server?  Is there issues with handling large 
numbers of vlans?

We have  2 WiSM centrally located and will be moving to OOB and posture 
assessment in the future.

Thanks,
Nancy

-- 
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Nancy Watson                    CNS Network Services
Sr. Network Engineer            352-273-1057
https://net-services.ufl.edu    352-392-5579 x167
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2