CLEANACCESS Archives

November 2007

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Osborne, Bruce W. (NS)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:45:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (171 lines)
Thanks for the clarification.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Austin
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 1:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] Manager loses control of OOB switches

Bruce,

Sorry, it should be externally visible, we'll look into that.

It is not an HA problem, it is a problem with the Manager not being able

to poll the switches port status via SNMP, and if that happens, it 
basically reverts all the ports to the default profile.

The problem is only in 4.1.2, not 4.1.1.

Nate


Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) wrote:
> Nate,
>
> That BugID is not available to us. More information, please. 
>
> Is this related to the High Availability manager, or a 3750 issue? 
>
> I am running 4.1.1 OOB VG with a majority of my OOB users on 3750s. Is
> there a patch for 4.1.1?
>
> Bruce Osborne
> Liberty University
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Austin
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 11:47 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] Manager loses control of OOB switches
>
> Bill,
>
> Looks like you are hitting CSCsk66548. It is due to be fixed in
version 
> 4.1.3, but a patch exists for 4.1.2.
>
> Nate
>
>
> Bill Davis wrote:
>   
>> We experienced a major outage Tuesday evening when our CCA Manager
>> (v4.1.2.0) lost the ability to change vlans from auth to access when
a
>>     
> user
>   
>> had "successfully logged on".
>>
>> 10 of the switch stacks (Cisco 3750's) in the device list indicated
>>     
> the
>   
>> manager was unable to control these switches, but we were also
getting
>> reports for users they were unable to log in throughout our OOB
>>     
> deployment,
>   
>> regardless of switch "control" or not.
>>
>> The symptom was the user would log in successfully, then within a
>>     
> couple
>   
>> seconds they would see the login screen pop up.  Obviously, the
>>     
> manager was
>   
>> unable to have the switch change the port to the access vlan once
>> authenticated/checked.  Of course, those logged in were able to
>>     
> maintain
>   
>> full access even if they did a link down/up.
>>
>> After rebooting, it was apparent the fail-over manager pair were
>>     
> confused
>   
>> and I finally shut down the standby server.  This resolved the issue.

>> Bringing the standby server back up caused it to reoccur, so I shut
it
>>     
> back
>   
>> down.  Possibly this is a database corruptions/sync error.
>>
>> On occasion, I have seen the switch configuration maintained by the
>>     
> manager
>   
>> come up with all ports "default uncontrolled" rather than displaying
>>     
> the
>   
>> port profiles that were specified.  The interface indicates the
switch
>>     
> needs
>   
>> to be updated and an exclamation mark is indicated by each port.
>>     
> Checking
>   
>> the switch config on the switch itself, the ports are all still set
up
>>     
> for
>   
>> control by the manager and I can see the snmp traffic flowing between
>>     
> the
>   
>> switch and manager (though they may just be one way UDP traffic
headed
>>     
> each
>   
>> direction).  Changing the manager UI port profiles back to the
>>     
> preferred
>   
>> profile and clicking on update sets the manager back correctly and it
>>     
> does
>   
>> not prompt to update the switch config.
>>
>> Has anyone else noticed problems with the managers not maintaining
the
>> correct switch configurations, port profiles, descriptions, or
>>     
> experienced a
>   
>> similar loss of control?
>>
>> And why didn't they include uploading the port description from the
>>     
> switch
>   
>> config via snmp rather than having to hand enter all the port
>>     
> description
>   
>> info???
>>
>> I think it is time to call Cisco TAC!
>>
>> -Bill Davis
>> Colorado State University
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2