Agreed!

--Homer Manila
Network Security Administrator
Office of Information Technology
American University
202-885-2209



Simon Bell wrote:
> Rajesh / Alok,
>
> Thanks for taking time to clarify. Your presence is certainly
> appreciated.
>
> Simon
>
>   
> From: 	"Rajesh Nair (rajnair)" <[log in to unmask]>
> To:	<[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 	8/18/2006 1:48 PM
> Subject: 	Re: IE 7 Beta
>
> Sorry folks... missed this thread due to some meetings... 
>  
> To confirm what Mike said, there is currently no 4.0.2.0 agent.  The
> 4.0.2 server release shipped with the 4.0.1.0 agent.  Hence, 4.0.x
> does
> not currently support IE 7 beta 3.  And yes, IE 7 beta 3 still breaks
> a
> lot of applications - so, even if the CCA agent works with it, there
> will definitely be other things that fail.  
>  
> And to confirm something else, 3.6.4.0 agent which came with the 3.6.4
> release (this release came after 4.0.2 release) added support for IE 7
> beta 3 (it worked with beta 2 as well - however, only beta 3 was
> tested/certified). 
>  
> Similar support will be added in a 4.0.2.0 agent which will be part of
> the 4.0.3 server release (which also contains supports for MCE and
> TabletPC).  We are trying to get this release out on an asap basis.
> Hence, we haven't announced an official release date.   That said, we
> are trying to get it out in days rather than weeks because of the
> discussions on this list.  I will come back with a firm date early
> next
> week.
>  
> Regards,
> Rajesh. 
> ________________________________
>
> From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike King
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 7:50 AM
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: Re: IE 7 Beta
>
>
> No the 4.0.2.x agent is not availble.
>
> I was just commenting on the fact that IE 7 Beta is never going to be
> supported on the older agents.  So the upgrade path for people with IE
> 7
> Beta is going to be bumpy.
>
> Sorry I wasn't clearer in my musings.
>
>
> On 8/18/06, Homer Manila <[log in to unmask]> wrote: 
>
> 	Am I missing something? Are you saying that 4.0.2.x agent is
> available?
> 	I don't see it on the download page....
> 	
> 	
>