Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:10:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
3.5.3 fixed a problem with High Availability? do tell; I don't see any
mention of it in the release notes, and I am definitely anxious to see
any improvements to HA after the massive outage it caused on our network
last week.
--Homer Manila
Network Security Administrator
Office of Information Technology
American University
Ransel Yoho wrote:
> Kent State uses Supermicro 5013G-M units for CASs, configured with
> 2.8Ghz P4, 1Gb RAM, 40gb IDE HD, CD, floppy, 2 onboard intel e1000
> nics. Cost = $870.
>
> The big plus is that the units are 1U, 14" depth, so they fit in telco
> racks.
>
> The upgrade to 3.5.3 fixed a problem with HA we were experiencing.
>
> Ransel Yoho
> Kent State University
>
>
>
> William Doyle
> <[log in to unmask]
> DU> To
> Sent by: Perfigo [log in to unmask]
> SecureSmart and cc
> CleanMachines
> Discussion List Subject
> <[log in to unmask] test installation
> MUOHIO.EDU>
>
>
> 07/26/2005 09:43
> AM
>
>
> Please respond to
> Perfigo
> SecureSmart and
> CleanMachines
> Discussion List
> <[log in to unmask]
> MUOHIO.EDU>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Good Day,
>
> I want to set up a test environment for the latest upgrade, but I don't
> have a couple of supported computers laying around.
>
> I'd be interested to hear of experiences running CCA on alternate
> boxes/configurations.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill Doyle
> International House
> UC Berkeley
|
|
|