I believe it's measured in concurrent users, not potential users.
Because it's a license restriction, it seems like it's easy to upgrade
to more users if you need to.
Michael Grinnell
Information Security Engineer
The American University
Kyle Evans wrote:
> Hi Howard,
>
> The engineer didn't happen to talk about whether the limit was on logged in
> users or truly active users did he? We usually have many more logged in users
> than truly active users, and bad license enforcement would be a great annoyance
> for us.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kyle
>
>
>
> Speight, Howard wrote:
>>
>> I didn’t sign a non-disclosure, but according to the engineer attending our
>> meeting about upgrading to 4.5, yes it is a hard limit. There is a fudge
>> factor of about 10%, but after that, clients will not be able to authenticate.
>> You need to do your math when upgrading. You can always upgrade to the next
>> level providing the highest level wasn’t selected to begin with…
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Todd Joyce
>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 06, 2008 18:12
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Re: CAS License Limits
>>
>>
>>
>> Not sure. I know it is not an unlimited user license like our converted
>> perfigo license. We had to purchase the amount of users we thought we were
>> going to have. Sales person is the best to ask
>>
>> todd
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Caines, Max <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Todd
>>
>>
>>
>> Are you saying that at 4.5 it becomes a hard limit?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Max Caines
>>
>> University of Wolverhampton, UK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators on behalf of Todd Joyce
>> *Sent:* Fri 05/12/2008 1:43 PM
>>
>>
>> *To:* [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [CLEANACCESS] CAS License Limits
>>
>> It is a suggested limit on versions before 4.5 rather than a hard limit. We
>> run over the number all the time with no problems.
>>
>> Todd Joyce
>> Radford University
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Richter, Ryan <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> We're approaching the 1500 user license limit on one CAS. We are working
>> on a solution to take users off of that CAS so we don't reach the cap.
>> (And with all of our CAS's licenses combined, we're still using well
>> under our total allotted.) But I'm curious as to what exactly would
>> happen with this CAS if we hit that limit?
>>
>> Would users start being denied access when they try to login?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ryan Richter
>> ResNet & Lab Services
>> Student Computing
>> California State University, Chico
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Joyce
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Pain is the precursor of change
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Scanned by iCritical.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Joyce
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Pain is the precursor of change
>>
|
