CLEANACCESS Archives

October 2008

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Caines, Max" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:43:25 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , smime.p7s (5 kB)
Unfortunately according to the server you can't do version checks on AVG
8.0, only date checks

Max 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Austin
> Sent: 09 October 2008 15:14
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] 4.1.7 agent
> 
> I'm just theorizing here based on what you've said, and I 
> agree that it 
> is weird - thats why I would run a test to make sure thats it 
> and that 
> its not something else causing it.
> 
> If that is the case then I would probably consider it a bug.
> 
> Nate
> 
> Dennis Xu wrote:
> > I will check if English/US will work.
> >
> > If I uncheck that box and do version check, I cannot allow 
> definition files to be X days older? It only allows the 
> latest version, correct?
> >
> > I am still wondering why with current set up(allow 
> definition files to be X days older), some AV products work 
> fine with English/Canada setting. For ex, McAfee 8.5 
> Enterprise works but McAfee 13 does not work. If it is caused 
> by regional setting, why McAfee 8.5 works? I would say 
> majority of AVs work fine under this setup.
> >
> > Dennis 
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nathaniel Austin" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2008 9:58:55 AM GMT -05:00 
> US/Canada Eastern
> > Subject: Re: 4.1.7 agent
> >
> > Hey Dennis,
> >
> > I would check to see if English/US would work - just to 
> verify that is 
> > the problem.
> >
> > Yes the CAM can check on version. Under your requirement 
> rules you have 
> > the option that is highlighted yellow that says allow 
> definition files 
> > to be X days older than. If you uncheck that box it will do version 
> > instead of date checks.
> >
> > Nate
> >
> > Dennis Xu wrote:
> >   
> >> I was thinking about regional format as well. One user has 
> regional format English/Canada and the other user has 
> regional format English/UK. The date format for both regions 
> are DDMMYYYY. I believe if they set the format to English/US 
> that will work. But I believe all the users laptops here are 
> default to English/Canada. That is a big problem. Can CAM 
> checks for definition version, not date?   
> >>
> >> Dennis 
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Nathaniel Austin" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2008 9:28:31 AM GMT -05:00 
> US/Canada Eastern
> >> Subject: Re: 4.1.7 agent
> >>
> >> Hey Dennis,
> >>
> >> May be a problem with the date format - in the CAM it 
> shows the date as 
> >> "10/07/2008" but it looks like the agent reported 
> "07/10/2008" from its 
> >> API call to the McAfee product - What date format is the 
> client set to 
> >> in the Windows settings?
> >>
> >> Nate
> >>
> >> Dennis Xu wrote:
> >>   
> >>     
> >>> I have seen two cases that 4.1.7 failed to recognize 
> McAfee 13 virus definition. For ex, the following user failed 
> virus definition check:
> >>>
> >>> Client AV Info
> >>>  
> >>> Product ID: McAfeeAV 
> >>> Product Name: McAfee VirusScan 
> >>> Product Version: 13.0.218 
> >>> Virus Definition File Version: 5400 
> >>> Virus Definition File Date: 07/10/2008 
> >>>
> >>> Anyone knows if it is a known bug?
> >>>
> >>> Dennis 
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Don Click" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2008 9:39:24 AM GMT -05:00 
> US/Canada Eastern
> >>> Subject: Re: 4.1.7 agent
> >>>
> >>> Yes, our system is setup to auto push the new agent. I do 
> have a few people using it, but haven't tested it myself.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kyle Torkelson
> >>> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:06 AM
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: 4.1.7 agent
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone been pushing out the 4.1.7 agent??  I saw it posted on
> >>> Cisco's software downloads section giving the following fixes:
> >>>
> >>> CSCsr75771      Support for Symantec Corp 10.1.5.500
> >>> CSCsr87134      Vista wired/wifi MAC address fix
> >>> CSCsr97355      Support for AVG 8
> >>>
> >>> Can anyone also address if 4.1.7 is going to be an agent 
> fix only and no
> >>> CAM/CAS release???
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Kyle Torkelson
> >>> Senior Network Administrator
> >>> University of Sioux Falls
> >>>   
> >>>     
> >>>       
> 


ATOM RSS1 RSS2