CLEANACCESS Archives

October 2008

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mary-Ellen Ide <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:54:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Great!  I just modified my check to verify netapi32.dll is later than 6.0.6001.18156 and it's working.

Thanks so much!



Mary Ide

Internet Security Engineer

Johnson & Wales University

SANS GCIH #1794

SANS GWAS #1728

[log in to unmask]





-----Original Message-----

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Calvin Krzywiec

Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 5:35 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Microsoft Patch



Just tested in Vista and moved into production. The check that I used 

verifies that netapi32.dll is later than 6.0.6001.18156



--

Cal A. Krzywiec

Network Engineer

The University of Scranton

Phone: (570) 941-6748

Email: [log in to unmask]







Mary-Ellen Ide wrote:

>

> I have created the rule for Vista and XP, and set the requirement up 

> as an “audit”.

>

> I patched Vista and it failed the audit check (see attachment).  Has 

> anyone been able to get this working with Vista?  I checked the 

> netapi32.dll and it is version  6.0.6001.18157. 

>

> I am in the process of patching Win XP and will then test that one…..

>

>  

>

> Mary Ide

>

> Internet Security Engineer

>

> Johnson & Wales University

>

> SANS GCIH #1794

>

> SANS GWAS #1728

>

> [log in to unmask] <BLOCKED::mailto:[log in to unmask]>

>

>  

>

> *From:* Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 

> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Stanclift, Michael

> *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2008 10:28 AM

> *To:* [log in to unmask]

> *Subject:* Re: Microsoft Patch

>

>  

>

> I setup the registry key below for XP, here is what I’m setting up for 

> Vista. Not 100% sure if it will work but I don’t see why it wouldn’t. 

> It checks for netapi32.dll file version 6.0.6001.18157 which is what 

> my computer reported as being installed after the update. Getting 

> ready to test it right now.

>

>  

>

> (attached)

>

>  

>

> *Michael Stanclift*

>

> *Network Analyst*

>

> *Rockhurst University*

>

>  

>

> http://help.rockhurst.edu <http://help.rockhurst.edu/>

> (816) 501-4231

>

>  

>

> *From:* Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 

> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *bouchaiba

> *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2008 7:45 AM

> *To:* [log in to unmask]

> *Subject:* Re: Microsoft Patch

>

>  

>

> Hi ,

>

>  

>

> Here are the registry keys  for XP

>

> 1-Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows XP Service Pack 3:

> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows 

> XP\SP4\KB958644\Filelist

>

>

> 2-Windows XP Professional x64 Edition and Windows XP Professional x64 

> Edition Service Pack 2:

> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows XP Version 

> 2003\SP3\KB958644\Filelist

>

> According to microsoft ,there are no reg keys for vista.

>

>

>

>  

>

>     -----Original Message-----

>     From: Todd Joyce

>     Sent: Oct 24, 2008 8:02 AM

>     To: [log in to unmask]

>     Subject: Microsoft Patch

>

>     Anyone figured out a check yet?

>

>     Todd Joyce

>     Radford University

>

>     -- 

>     Todd Joyce

>     [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

>

>     Pain is the precursor of change

>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2