Cal,

I want to first address the "bug" part of the email.  I will respond to
the feature request part later, if you don't mind. 

Does the Guest Role have a session timer?  If so, is it enabled?  Are
you indicating that with a session timer of 24 hours, the user was not
logged out?  Also, does the Guest role have either network scanning or
agent based requirements configured?  Or are you only doing tracking for
guest users? 

Btw, even if you have a session timer of 24 hours for a guest, they will
be logged out but they will be able to log back in unless the guest
account is being sourced from a backend authentication server where the
guest account is disabled after 24 hours such that the account fails
authentication. 

I might have misunderstood some things in your email.  Also, if you wish
to continue the discussion offline or provide more details about your
installation, you know my email address. 

Regards,
-Rajesh.

-----Original Message-----
From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cal Frye
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 11:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A task that could be easier

It seemed to me that my concerns were being subsumed within the SNMP
requests discussion; I wanted to be clear that there are two separate
threads going on, here, perhaps for two communities, yes.

The "turnkey solution" has always been rather clumsy, enabling SNMP will
not fix that. If development emphasis heads in that direction, I'm left
with the difficult interface I have. Surely they can work on both?

--Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
   www.ouuf.org, www.calfrye.com
   Say Yes Twice for Oberlin Schools!   www.oberlinyesyes.com

  "What is more immoral than war?" --Marquis de Sade.


Jason Richardson wrote:
> How does
> enabling SNMP for some of us to access that additional information 
> negatively impact you or others who are not inclined to do so?