CLEANACCESS Archives

October 2005

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cal Frye <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:41:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
It seemed to me that my concerns were being subsumed within the SNMP requests
discussion; I wanted to be clear that there are two separate threads going on,
here, perhaps for two communities, yes.

The "turnkey solution" has always been rather clumsy, enabling SNMP will not fix
that. If development emphasis heads in that direction, I'm left with the
difficult interface I have. Surely they can work on both?

--Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
   www.ouuf.org, www.calfrye.com
   Say Yes Twice for Oberlin Schools!   www.oberlinyesyes.com

  "What is more immoral than war?" --Marquis de Sade.


Jason Richardson wrote:
> How does
> enabling SNMP for some of us to access that additional information
> negatively impact you or others who are not inclined to do so?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2