Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:45:00 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nate,
When was this change communicated to Cisco's Clean Access customers??
It appears to me that the BU does not want this product to succeed.
Bruce Osborne
Liberty University
-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Austin
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 9:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] Microsoft Patch
Hey Mike,
Word from the BU is that they will only update from Microsoft once a
month, so this one will not go into the checks and rule set until next
months Patch Tuesday release.
So a preemptive apology to everyone out there who wants this now. I
think there are some good custom checks that some of you have created to
at least get it checked for in your environments in the meantime.
I know this isn't really a consolation, but I think this again proves
that the WSUS style requirement that checks against Microsoft's WU
servers instead of our checks and rules is a much better option.
Nate
Mike Diggins wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) wrote:
>
>> When I last checked this afternoon, Cisco still did not have their
>> check published. What happened to the commitment to publish within 48
>> hours of patch release??
>
> I was wondering that myself. I checked a few times today to see if it
> had been published. I normally only update my CCA servers once a
> month, so as not to annoy my clients too much, but this one seems like
> it needs special attention.
>
> -Mike
|
|
|