Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 21 Aug 1996 22:50:00 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Actually my first thoughts of the album was that the voices sounded like the
connells of past. But, the music was not like anything they have ever done
before. I haven't figured it out yet but there is something missing in this
new album.
I think the songs: "Maybe", and "Just Like That" are the two songs that
remind me of the earlier connells sound. What do y'all think.
>---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
>Sender: The Connells <[log in to unmask]>
>Poster: Evan Kline <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Thoughts on WFAD
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>I've now had a chance to digest the new album a bit more. I believe I
>previously used the term "somber" to describe it. That's not an accurate
>description. I do think the album is less of a "pop" album than Ring, and
>probably slower paced, too. This is not necessarily a bad thing, however. I
>like the idea that each of their albums has been different, while still
>retaining the "Connells sound." I think good bands avoid cookie cutter
>albums.
>Does anyone else think that Doug's voice sounds just a bit different from
>album to album, or is it me? For example, it seems that on One Simple Word,
>he belts out some of the songs, while he retains more of an even keel on
>Ring. I think he shows a grittier side to his voice, or at least puts an
>edge to it, on many of the tracks on the new album.
> Jamie Kline
>
>
Todd
<[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|