CONNELLS Archives

January 1996

CONNELLS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Pare <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Connells <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:15:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
   Since there seems to be more discussion on the TCS list about the Connells
than on the Connells list, I figured I would forward this particularly
opinionated letter over here to see if it would stir up a little commentary.
 
Eric
 
-----
 
Subj:    Re: Connells (non-TCS)
Date:   Thu, Jan 18, 1996 11:28 AM PDT
From:  [log in to unmask]
X-From: [log in to unmask] (Eric Ostermeier)
Sender: [log in to unmask] (The Music of the Trash Can Sinatras)
Reply-to: [log in to unmask] (The Music of the Trash Can Sinatras)
To: [log in to unmask] (Multiple recipients of list TRASHCAN)
 
I've been a Connells fan since 1988 or so, and I'd have to say without
hesitation that Fun-n-Games is their worst album by far.  For one, George
Huntley (or whatever his name is) sings almost half of the tracks on the
album - Doug McMillan' voice is the strength of the group.  Also George's
tracks tend to be a lot more 70's folky.
 
While their debut Darker Days has some excellent tracks (title track), I
actually think Ring is their best overall album.  It has a few upbeat
rockers, but a whole string of beautiful maudlin slow numbers as well.  I
think Ring is indicative both of their 'style' and also shows them at their
most focused.
 
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2