HUMANRIGHTS Archives

November 2019

HUMANRIGHTS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joanna Tegnerowicz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Joanna Tegnerowicz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Nov 2019 05:00:40 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (120 lines)
Nobel peace prize winners launch fund for wartime rape survivors
http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2019/oct/31/denis-mukwege-and-nadia-murad-launch-fund-for-wartime-survivors

Liz Ford
Thu 31 Oct 2019 07.00 GMT

Nobel laureates Denis Mukwege and Nadia Murad have launched a fund to
provide reparations for survivors of wartime rape.

The Global Survivors Fund will provide tailored support to help people
recover from the emotional and physical trauma they have experienced.
This could be in the form of financial compensation, support to access
healthcare services or return to education, or assistance with getting
somewhere to live.

The fund will also support governments to set up their own reparation schemes.

The initiative, officially launched in New York on Wednesday, is
expected to attract funding from donor governments and the private
sector, with the aim of raising between $50m (£38m) and $100m by 2022.

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has already committed €6m (£5m)
to the fund, while the EU has pledged €2m. Germany provided about
€200,000 “seed” money to help establish the fund, and the UK, Japan,
South Korea and Norway are understood to be exploring ways to support
it.

Esther Dingemans, director of the Mukwege Foundation, said the aim of
the fund was to provide restorative justice for survivors. “What has
really been missing is recognition of the harm done to them, which is
extremely important, and prevention of stigma,” she said.

Mukwege, a surgeon whose Panzi hospital in the Democratic Republic of
the Congo has helped tens of thousands of people who survived sexual
violence perpetrated by armed forces, said in advance of the launch:
“The importance of establishing this fund for survivors of
conflict-related sexual violence cannot be overstated. We have been
advocating such an initiative for many years. Seeing it come to
fruition is a huge step forwards for humanity.”

Murad, a Yazidi woman who became a human rights campaigner after
escaping enslavement by Isis, added: “Reparations are a step toward
restoring dignity to survivors who often do not have any means to seek
justice for the pain and suffering they have endured. A global fund is
an innovative solution to providing survivors with a path towards
healing, and it signals that our collective conscience acts in the
name of humanity.”

Mukwege and Murad jointly received the Nobel peace prize last year.

The creation of the fund was included in a UN security council
resolution to combat rape in conflict that was passed in April, after
the US successfully lobbied members to remove key language related to
women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights.

On Tuesday, the security council passed another resolution, introduced
by South Africa. It is the 10th such resolution passed since 2000 that
seeks to address women’s specific experiences of conflict, and press
for their involvement in peace negotiations and post-conflict
reconstruction.

The new resolution called for the full implementation of commitments
made by members almost two decades ago. But it failed to mention
sexual and reproductive health and rights, and was criticised by Karen
Pierce, the UK ambassador to the UN, for being weak in scope.

“We believe that the resolution would have broken new ground if it had
included explicit language on women human rights defenders and their
protection and their security,” Pierce told the security council. “The
work of women human rights defenders is essential to the functioning
of democracy and the maintenance and achievement of peace.”

She also criticised the failure to recognise the central role of civil
society in leading efforts for change, and emphasised that full
implementation needed to include sexual and reproductive health
services.

“I know that not all member states agree with this but from the
perspective of the United Kingdom, [sexual and reproductive health and
rights] and their services are a vital part of public services for
women in all countries, and a vital part of ensuring that women can
play a truly equal role in the building of their countries,” she said.

The UK had voted for the April resolution, despite the exclusion of
sexual and reproductive health and rights.

The executive director of UN Women, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, told the
security council: “The loud and common message is: progress is too
slow, political will is not strong enough, and pushback against the
needs and interests of women is threatening the progress we have made
and pushing further away those who need the resolve and support most.”

Last week, more than 400 civil society groups across 94 countries
signed an open letter calling on UN member states to recommit to
promises made in 2000.

“As non-governmental organisations dedicated to gender equality and
women’s rights, we firmly believe that the feminist principle of
women’s agency remains at the heart of the WPS agenda and that we
cannot achieve sustainable peace without women’s full, equal and
meaningful participation in all levels of decision-making,” read the
letter.

“However, nearly 20 years since the adoption of resolution 1325
[passed in 2000], despite the fact that conflicts disproportionately
impact the health, safety, and the human rights of women and girls,
they remain shut out of decision-making processes that determine their
future.”

Now you can check us out on Facebook

please go to..

https://www.facebook.com/Humanrightsandsocialjusticenow/

and tell all our friends..


thanks..

ATOM RSS1 RSS2