OHIOFIRE Archives

April 2001

OHIOFIRE@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Patz, Tom" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
International Association of Campus Fire Safety Officials <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:26:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (270 lines)
Jim,

I am a little curious about the "walk test" function on alarm systems you
are referring to.  Could you elaborate on the term.  I am not familiar with
this one but I am always looking for ways to make things easier to maintain
and test.

Thanks,

Tom

Thomas Patz
Environmental Health & Safety
Franklin College of Indiana
501 E. Monroe St.
Franklin, IN  46131

(317) 738-8178


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Jim Robinson [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Friday, April 27, 2001 7:28 AM
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        Re: Sprinkler Installations

        IACFSO & Ed:
            Here's some information on the University of Maryland
experience. Some
        background first -
        This is a large campus with 46 resident halls (3 - 10 stories;
~10,000
        residents @ 30 - 550 per bldg; many designs like garden style apts,
traditional
        double loaded corridors, apartments & suites, and highrises,
constructed
        between 1912 - 1973), 22 university owned fraternity & sorority
houses leased
        to private corporations, plus 20 or so off campus greek houses.
            Like most public universities, our resident halls are 'self
support',
        receiving no state or university funding. Our fire experience in the
70's was 1
        or 2 complete room & contents fires every semester; rarely did they
go beyond
        the room of origin. In 79, we installed single station smoke
detectors in every
        sleeping room. These dramatically reduced the size of our fires due
to the
        early warning we (the occupants) were getting.
            In 1983, we removed all fire extinguishers from residential
spaces (still
        have them in maint shops, elevator rooms, other 'hazardous areas',
etc. where
        required by 101). When they know there aren't any extinguishers,
they tend to
        leave faster and call the FD quicker. Our # & size of fire incidents
has not
        increased, our $$'s damaged has decreased, our injuries are down,
and the FD
        gets on the scene earlier.
            Besides the res hall fires, we experienced several R&C fires in
adacemic &
        service buildings, enough so that our Facilities VP declared that
all new
        construction & major renovations would incorporate auto sprinklers.
At this
        time (late 70's), we had about 100,000 sq ft of sprinkler protection
campus
        wide, no fully sprinklered resident halls.
            In 1980, we embarked on a program of gutting & renovation of 17
older dorms
        which started with the construction of 6 garden style apartments
that were our
        1st fully sprinkler res halls. In 1985, we started the retrofit of
resident
        halls that were not scheduled for renovation under the above
program, doing
        50,000 - 100,000 per year. Although the retrofit program stopped in
91, at the
        beginning of a recession, renovations have continued, adding older
halls to the
        original 17. This was funded by bonds paid back by self support
funds and
        resident fees.
            In the early 90's we started the renovation of 14 of our campus
greek
        houses, a program similar to the resident hall renovation program
but funded by
        per-bed assessments to the greek organizations. These corporations
were given
        the option of joining this program. Those that didn't were given a
deadline to
        have certain utility & life safety upgrades including sprinklers
completed.
        Only one house has completed this so in the next few years, the
others are
        being pushed into a renovation program.
            About a month ago, our student affairs group (they oversee the
resident
        halls & greek houses) announces a $10.8 million four year plan to
retrofit the
        remaining 9 resident halls & 6 sorority houses with new sprinkler &
fire alarm
        systems, funded by a resident fee increase of $81 (I can't remember
if this is
        per year or per semester). Though this translates to more than $10
per sq ft,
        more than half of this is going to cosmetic stuff, not
sprinkler/fire alarm.
            I've imbedded some responses to your questions below.

        "Ed Comeau, Publisher" wrote:

        > I am working on a story for an upcoming issue of Campus Firewatch
on
        > sprinkler installations in residence halls and Greek housing, and
I am
        > looking for some assistance.  I would be interested in people's
experiences
        > with the following:
        >
        > -Convincing the administration for the need and getting funding

            You need to have a couple of 'good' fires on your own campus or
keep
        hammering them with the experiences of other campuses like Chapel
Hill, Seton
        Hall, Bloomsburg, etc.

        >
        > -Design methods/tips/strategies

        Follow NFPA 13 (basement mechanical, storage, shops office & meeting
spaces) &
        13R (for sleeping spaces) and hire a good sprinkler contractor to do
the design
        stuff.

        >
        > -Cost issues

        There are lots of things that need to be considered that can be
broken down to
        descrete components for estimating purposes -
            1) the incoming water line (from the street to the building) may
be old
        (tuberculated) or too small to support the sprinkler system - try to
figure out
        a unit price per linear ft for estimating purposes
            2) for estimating fire pumps, get some unit costs for packages
that include
        the fire pump, jockey pump, and controllers for various sizes of
there - 250,
        500, & 750 gpm for instance.
            3) there are lots of sources for sq ft estimates of sprinkler
systems, both
        new installation (which is generally less per sq ft) and retrofit
from the WWW.

            4) don't even think about attaching a new sprinkler system to a
30 year old
        fire alarm system and don't let them install a sub panel to monitor
the tampers
        & flows and activate an old system. you really should replace the
fire alarm
        system if it's more than 10 years old and particularly if it's not
an
        addressable system.
            5) be sure that the fire alarm has the 'walk test' feature so
the system
        can be tested with minimal personnel.

        >
        > -Installation design/tips/strategies, especially regarding
installations that
        > minimize downtime and disruption

        I have lots of these, probably too many to list in an email
response. Simple
        things include using existing standpipe risers, adding spklr valve
connections
        on each floor; use concealed heads in corridors (less prone to
damage by
        freshmen, frisbees, & footballs; if you don't have enough space for
concealed
        heads, line up the struts of exposed heads in the direction of the
hall to
        protect the fusible element; don't specify steel over CPVC because
the plastic,
        if installed right, will last as long (or longer) than steel; avoid
fire pumps
        if you can, if you can't, use the smallest you can get away with but
a minimum
        of 250 gpm (they're not special order items, 150's usually are);
look at
        DecoShield with CPVC and SoffitSteel to conceal piping where space
is at a
        premium; and the list goes on ....
            Inspector's test valves should be piped to an express drain line
that
        discharges outside the building or to a big sump pit. This will save
time
        during testing and makes emergency drain downs easy to execute.

        >
        > -Success stories where sprinklers have played a role

        Over the last 21 years, we've had numerous successes in our
sprinklered halls
        and several 'boy, were we lucky' in non-sprinklered halls. We also
had one
        'failure' in 1976, a fire death in a fully sprinklered building. The
reasons
        for this were 1) it was before smoke detectors were installed, 2) it
was before
        residential heads were on the market, and 3) the fatality had an
extremely high
        BAC and couldn't respond appropriately when he set his mattress on
fire.

        >
        > -Unforeseen difficulties encountered during installations

        Hydraulic calcs showed need for a 150 gpm fire pump. Since this is
not an off
        the shelf model, it took more than 3 months to get one. Students
were moving in
        for the fall semester as the pump was being installed. Spec 250 gpm
as a
        minimum.

        With lots of good planning and some experience, most problems can be
avoided.
        Networking with those who have been there can prevent reinvention of
the wheel.

        >
        > -Experiences with sprinkler ordinances

        We haven't had success in getting mandatory retrofit ordinances,
only where
        required in new construction/renovation. Ours has been primarily a
voluntary
        retrofit program.

        >
        > -Anything else related to sprinklers!
        >
        > If you would like to share your experiences, I'd really appreciate
it.  You
        > can contact me at
        >
        > mailto:[log in to unmask]
        >
        > Thanks, everyone!
        >
        > Ed
        >
        > -------------------------------
        > Ed Comeau, Publisher
        > Campus Firewatch
        > PO Box 1046
        > Belchertown, MA  01007
        > http://www.campus-firewatch.com
        > mailto:[log in to unmask]
        > 1-413-323-6002 (tel)
        > 1-413-323-5295 (fax)
        > -------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2