On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Greenbaum, Amy Ms.
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> I think that this is a great idea.  Doing this has great potential for Pilot participants and for those working on Sakai for the roll-out and future.

So how do we put this in motion? Most basically, which group should
have responsibility for it?

Bruce

> Amy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IT Services Sakai Team [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bruce D'Arcus
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 11:04 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: on use cases, best practices, etc.
>
> So I know I'm not the only one that has wondered about this, but ...
>
> In the course of discussions on the new pilot list, it strikes me that
> some questions are presenting "this is what I need to do" use cases
> and requirements of sorts, and asking for how best to achieve those
> goals in Sakai now.
>
> I'm wondering if this doesn't provide an opportunity to kill two birds
> with one stone:
>
> 1. documenting best practices now
> 2. gathering more forward looking requirements language that we can
> feed into the OAE development process to make sure it covers our needs
> longer term
>
> So is there plan for documenting these? For example, should there be
> an issue in Jira for "peer review best practices"? Should we use the
> confluence wiki to document these? Should we use the forum?
>
> Bruce
> --
> Bruce D'Arcus
> Associate Professor, Graduate Director
> Department of Geography
> Miami University
> 234 Shideler Hall
> Oxford, Ohio 45056
>



-- 
Bruce D'Arcus
Associate Professor, Graduate Director
Department of Geography
Miami University
234 Shideler Hall
Oxford, Ohio 45056