Thanks, I missed that one.

My SOP is to compare my current rule set (which is a copy of Cisco's
rule set) to one that Cisco publishes about a day after Patch Tuesday.)
to see if any thing has disappeared. I also check when I get someone
that can't seem to pass the windows update rule.  I'm under a mandate
from upper management to not have an outside company dictate our policy.
Personally, I'd rather just have then "Live".  But this policy came from
last year when Microsoft Re-issued 5 patches, completely changing the
Reg location, but not the KB id.  It took several hours, and a few calls
to TAC to straighten that out.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pender, Anne
> 
> 899588 has been replaced by 905749.  But the MS KB article for the
> 899588 doesn't mention that it has been superseded, so it's a 
> little tricky to track down.  (I was searching the KB, but 
> the details for security patches aren't kept in the KB, 
> they're just linked out to the technet security site...)