I think it really depends on your deployment. We use inband, virtual
gateway and are not running a whole ton of checks and it seems to be
going fine... Well, as fine as any version of Clean Access we've
implemented (particularly with Macs, we've had some serious annoyances
with each version so far).

Should the Mac client get fixed to not take up all the system resources
(have we had any word on this?), we at the Univ. of Portland would be
fully up to 4.1.3.1 and chugging away fine.

- Sean

----

Sean Hennessey

Networking and Information Security Systems Administrator

The University of Portland

-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Stewart
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Thoughts on 4.1.3?

Spring break is next week for us.  How is everyone on the list
feeling 
about 4.1.3.1?  After watching the list after this release we decided to

hold off.  I still have some mixed feelings about this release but 
wanted to see how the list felt.

Thanks!

Dennis Xu wrote:
 > We upgraded to CCA 4.1.3.0 with agent 4.1.3.1 yesterday and haven't
seen
 > any issues. But if you have double quotes in the agent download page
 > text, your agent download page maybe messed up after the upgrade.
This
 > happened to us. The workaround is to replace all the double quotes
with
 > single quotes. The bug ID for this issue is CSCsm32684.  
 >
 > Dennis Xu
 > Network Analyst(CCS)
 > University of Guelph
 > 5198244120 x 56217
 >
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
 > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Diggins
 > Sent: February-05-08 1:50 PM
 > To: [log in to unmask]
 > Subject: Thoughts on 4.1.3?
 >
 > I'm looking to upgrade our CCA 4.1.2.0 up to 4.1.3.0 (with agent
 > 4.1.3.1) 
 > shortly. We don't use the Macintosh agent. I'm not interested in most
of
 >
 > the new features but I'd like support for the latest AV software, and
64
 >
 > bit Windows would be nice as well.
 >
 > I haven't heard anything very positive about this version. Is it
stable 
 > enough now or should I wait for the next one?
 >
 > Cisco folks, is there a 4.1.3.1 Server update imminent?
 >
 > -Mike
 >
 >   

-- 
Jeff Stewart

Network Engineer
Network Computing & Support
Western Kentucky University