SAKAIGOV Archives

November 2010

SAKAIGOV@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Greenbaum, Amy Ms." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
IT Services Sakai Gov <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:49:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Bruce,



I think that this is a great idea.   Doing this has great potential for Pilot participants and for those working on Sakai for the roll-out and future.



Amy



-----Original Message-----

From: IT Services Sakai Team [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bruce D'Arcus

Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 11:04 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: on use cases, best practices, etc.



So I know I'm not the only one that has wondered about this, but ...



In the course of discussions on the new pilot list, it strikes me that

some questions are presenting "this is what I need to do" use cases

and requirements of sorts, and asking for how best to achieve those

goals in Sakai now.



I'm wondering if this doesn't provide an opportunity to kill two birds

with one stone:



1. documenting best practices now

2. gathering more forward looking requirements language that we can

feed into the OAE development process to make sure it covers our needs

longer term



So is there plan for documenting these? For example, should there be

an issue in Jira for "peer review best practices"? Should we use the

confluence wiki to document these? Should we use the forum?



Bruce

-- 

Bruce D'Arcus

Associate Professor, Graduate Director

Department of Geography

Miami University

234 Shideler Hall

Oxford, Ohio 45056


ATOM RSS1 RSS2