PARTNERS Archives

January 2011

PARTNERS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Наталья Кравчук <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Partners Project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:28:50 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (722 lines)
Bridget, 
 sounds like it is exactly what we need and I even don't understand why we initially though that groups from different universities should be of the same size! ))

Natasha


Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:59:15 -0500 письмо от "Costello, Bridget" <[log in to unmask]>:

> Regarding group size, we would also prefer to allow two or three students per
> institution -- for us, this simplifies the logistics of the service-learning
> projects. Can we leave it up to each institution to specify how many of their
> own students can participate in a group, and keep the master guidelines broad
> (for example, up to a maximum of three per institution, five or six per group,
> each group representing at least two institutions)? That way we still allow
> for student mixing and smaller groups, but can also accommodate institutions
> that may want or need to allow multiple students per group.
> 
> Bridget
> 
> 
> Bridget McKenney Costello, Ph.D.
> Assistant Professor of Sociology, King's College
> 133 N. River St.
> Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711
> [log in to unmask]
> (570)208-5900 ext. 5745
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Partners Project [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> ??????? ???????
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 1:42 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Clarification
> 
> Morning everyone,
> 
> it is quite uncomfortable to be on the the other side of the planet - I feel
> deprivd of the possibility to take  take part in the conversation. )))
> 
> I actually would like to claif some misanderstanfing between me and Winnie
> which occued following my bad english surely. I still think that we should
> have 2 grups from 2 different universities , 3 persons in each group (which
> maked it 3 X 2 = 6 persons in each group belonging to 2 universities) I hope I
> make it more clear now.
> 
> My reasoning: english is not a native language for my students. For some of
> them it would be problematic to have an active interaction with the native
> speakers. To support them I plan to group them with people whose language
> skills would allow the whole group (of three persons) to develop and present
> the project in english.
> 
> Let me know if this structure is ok for you all
> 
> thanks Natasha
> 
> 
> 
> Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:40:06 +0000 письмо от Winnie Poster
> <[log in to unmask]>:
> 
> > Thanks for the fast comments!  (and an apology from me as well for my last
> > reply to Elaine which went to the whole group -- we'll get this right one of
> > these days ...)
> >
> > Bridget raises a great issue -- if we're organizing projects by topic,
> there's
> > no real reason to separate the groups by methodology.  If no one has any
> > objection, we'll just make one forum instead of two (i.g., case study and
> > service learning) for setting up groups.
> >
> > Some responses to Bruces great points as well -- yes, we've arranged the
> forum
> > discussions by topic, and then within these, some faculty have set up
> > sub-forums for their students.  One advantage is making it easier to keep
> > track of student postings for purposes of grades.
> >
> > I'd like to point out another option for students too.  I've set up an "all
> > students forum" inside each of the discussion topics, so that students can
> > interact with each other there across universities.  (In fact, I personally
> > will NOT be having a separate discussion forum for my university -- I'll
> tell
> > my students to go to the "all students" forum.  Then I'll have them print
> out
> > their entries for grading purposes.)
> >
> > Since we have a requirement for students to "respond" to the postings of
> other
> > students, I hope faculty who have set up their own university discussion
> > groups will not mind if outsiders comment on their entries (although I'm not
> > even sure that's allowed through the software ....)
> >
> > Thanks for noting the distinction between "blog" and "forum" on NING -- that
> > could really get confusing we didn't catch it quick!  And we should
> definitely
> > tell students about chat -- maybe they could print those out as well for
> > grading?
> >
> > Winnie
> >
> > On Jan 17, 2011, at 7:08 PM, BRUCE FRIESEN wrote:
> >
> > > Colleagues:
> > >
> > > My class begins this week.  I'm excited about the possibilities for myself
> > and the 18 students enrolled in my class.  Below are some comments and
> > questions, for clarification:
> > >
> > > 1.  Thank you to Winnie and Natasha.  I like the structure you've provided
> > for group projects.  After each of my students have formed a group with
> > students from two other institutions, I'll encourage them to create a HUDDLE
> > WORKSPACE in Ning for the three of them.  It allows them to work privately
> > together.
> > >
> > > 2.  From what I'm seeing, we're going to encourage students to create
> their
> > "blog" entries using the FORUM option in Ning.  Within each subheading of
> the
> > FORUM (i.e. Globalization, Social Justice, Human Rights), each faculty
> member
> > will create the Discussion in which their students can blog.  Am I
> > understanding this correctly?  That way students will be able to view
> > students' "blogs" from other institutions and post a response as required.
> > >
> > > If this is the case, my only word of caution is to inform our students
> that
> > "blogging" will take place in the FORUM instead of the option entitled
> > "BLOGS."
> > >
> > > 3.  The syllabus encourages students to interact with students from other
> > institutions, and that this activity will not be graded.  I'll encourage my
> > students to do this, then, under the "BLOGS" option, and perhaps the CHAT
> > option.  Is this acceptable to everyone?
> > >
> > > 4.  For week 2 on Human Rights, the first link in the readings takes me to
> a
> > page of background on Indigenous Peoples.  I assume this should instead be a
> > link to the UDHR?  Please confirm, Rodney.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Bruce Friesen, Sociology
> > > University of Tampa
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: The Partners Project on behalf of Winnie Poster
> > > Sent: Mon 1/17/2011 3:09 PM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: comments please! draft on setting up project groups
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Partners!
> > >
> > > Natasha and I have come up with a draft of instructions for students on
> how
> > to select their topic and their group for the projects.  Please look over
> and
> > tell us your improved ideas, or how to make it work better with your course.
> > Please note:
> > >
> > > 1.  we're proposing smaller groups to make them more flexible and workable
> > for the distance work relationships.  Hope that's ok!
> > >
> > > 2.  we set a deadline for choosing groups that we hope is workable for all
> > the different schedules out there.  Let us know if it is not convenient.
> > >
> > > Comments are appreciated ASAP!  We'll try to post this on the website by
> the
> > end of this week.   Also welcome are suggestions of exactly *how* or *what*
> > students should do in their groups once they are formed.....
> > >
> > > Thanks, Winnie and Natasha
> > >
> > >
> > > Instructions for Choosing a Project Topic and Group:
> > >
> > > 1.  Decide on a topic concerning Globalization and Human Rights.  We
> > recommend that you start by looking at the topics on your course syllabus
> and
> > discussing it with your instructor.
> > >
> > > a.  Choose a general topic of human rights, e.g. ("environmental rights",
> > "children's rights," "labor rights", etc.).   This needs to be focused
> enough
> > to have a common theme, but broad enough that students from different
> > locations can join in with specific examples from their communities.  Rights
> > listed on the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights are good examples.
> > >
> > > b.  Within the general topic, select your specific topic that will reflect
> > your particular research methodology and geographic context.  For instance,
> if
> > you are doing volunteer work at a homeless shelter, your general topic may
> be
> > "poverty" and your specific topic will be "service learning and observation
> of
> > homelessness in XX city of XX country."  Remember think about both the
> "local"
> > and "global" about the causes and manifestations of human rights in your
> > community.  The overall theme of the course will be global, and you may be
> > directly comparing your topic to that of another country in your group.
> > However, depending upon the group formation, you may have members from the
> > same country, and therefore, the city or state based comparisons will be
> more
> > important.
> > >
> > > c.   Get formal approval of your topic from your instructor.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2.  Join a group on the website.  Go to the Forum Discussion link and look
> > for "Case Study Topics," or "Service Learning Topics".
> > >
> > > a.  Look to see if you like any of the existing posted general topics.  If
> > so, join the group by "replying" to an existing post.  Enter your specific /
> > sub topic, and the university and country you are from.  In the subject
> line,
> > mention if you are the "second" or "third" member of the group.
> > >
> > > b.  If your topic is not listed, create a new group by "replying" with the
> > subject line:  "Proposed General Topic:  [insert here]".  Enter your
> specific
> > / sub topic, and the university and country you are from.
> > >
> > > c.  In your post, try to be as specific as you can about what you intend
> to
> > study, and how you plan to do it.
> > >
> > > d.  If you want to change groups, send another post with the subject
> > "withdrawing from group"
> > >
> > >
> > > 3.  Rules for joining groups!
> > >
> > > a.  Maximum 3 students per group.  Once two others have replied to a given
> > topic, it is closed.  You can start a new topic with the exact same heading,
> > however.
> > >
> > > b.  Maximum 1 representative per university.  If sometime has already
> joined
> > the group from your school, you may not join.  However, you are welcome to
> > start a new group post with the same topic.
> > >
> > > c.  Recommendation (but not requirement):  try to pick a group that has
> some
> > international diversity.  It may not be possible for every group to have
> > members from different countries, but let's try.  When choosing your group,
> > see if your country is already represented, and if so, pick a different one.
> > >
> > > d.  Deadline is February 11.  If you are having trouble finding or joining
> a
> > group by February 11, send a reply post to the "Please Assign Me a Group"
> > thread.  If your group is not filled by that date, we will try to fill it
> for
> > you.  If we cannot, we may be assigning you a new group.
> > >
> > >
> > > Faculty:    If you have special instructions or criteria for your students
> > about what kind of topic or project group they join, please give them in
> > class.  You can also monitor what groups they are joining on your own, and
> if
> > you would prefer they join a different group, instruct them to "withdraw"
> and
> > rejoin another.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________
> > > Dr. Winifred R. Poster
> > > Brown School of Social Work
> > > Washington University
> > > Campus Box 1196
> > > One Brookings Drive
> > > St. Louis, MO 63130
> > > www.winifredposter.com
> > > [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 17, 2011, at 10:24 AM, ??????? ??????? wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >     Hello, Winnie,
> > >      did you get my message? Shall we continue the discussion?
> > >     I have couple of concerns - the main is that different universities
> choose
> > various forms of participation in our joint course. At least one  (Mason)
> will
> > not make a joint project an obligatory part for Moson university' course. I
> > guess we should know in advance who is in and who is not to be able to group
> > people (((
> > >
> > >     cheers,
> > >
> > >     Natasha
> > >
> > >
> > >     Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:42:40 +0000 ?????? ?? Winnie Poster
> > <[log in to unmask]>:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >             Hi Natasha,
> > >
> > >             (love your name, by the way, I chose this name for my
> daughter!)
> > >
> > >
> > >             Shall we start working on the projects?  Here are my thoughts:
> > >
> > >             1.  I love the idea of starting with topics.  Let's do that.
> > >
> > >             2.  I'm thinking we should reduce the group size -- 6 is way
> too big to
> > coordinate across countries, much less in one room!  I say three  -- all
> from
> > different universities.
> > >
> > >             3.  How about we let the students try to organize themselves
> at first?  We
> > could open a discussion forum, and students could post a general topic
> theme.
> > Then interested students from other universities could "reply" if they want
> to
> > join.  It would be much easier for students to arrange this on their own.
> > Anyone who doesn't have a group can reply to a "please assign me to a group"
> > discussion forum.
> > >
> > >             4.  Then, for the groups that don't find enough partners, we
> could take
> > over and fill in.  We could set an overall deadline, like Friday Feb 11
> (which
> > looks like a time when all the course would have started).  Then you and I
> > could distribute the unassigned people into existing incomplete groups, or
> put
> > them into new groups.
> > >
> > >             What do you think????
> > >
> > >             cheers,
> > >
> > >             Winnie
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >             _______________________________________
> > >             Dr. Winifred R. Poster
> > >             Brown School of Social Work
> > >             Washington University
> > >             Campus Box 1196
> > >             One Brookings Drive
> > >             St. Louis, MO 63130
> > >             www.winifredposter.com <http://www.winifredposter.com/>
> > >             [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >             Begin forwarded message:
> > >
> > >
> > >                     From: ??????? ??????? <[log in to unmask]>
> > >
> > >                     Date: January 8, 2011 4:48:58 AM CST
> > >
> > >                     To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > >
> > >                     Subject: Re: Questions, Process, and Getting Started
> > >
> > >                     Reply-To: The Partners Project
> <[log in to unmask]>
> > >
> > >
> > >                     hello, everyone,
> > >
> > >                     thinking about how we are going to group students:
> > >                     I would say we should start  from students naming the
> topics of interest.
> > Then when each faculty has a list (with three students supporting each
> topic)
> > we can make the join list on the website to who is interested in what and
> how
> > we can group them.
> > >                     As long as HSE is making a joint course with the Mason
> University I
> > presume some our goroups will be joint, but I would not want to limit the
> > students and would let them choose the topic first
> > >
> > >                     What do you think about this?
> > >
> > >                     Natasha
> > >
> > >                     Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:33:42 +0000 ?????? ?? Rodney Coates
> > <[log in to unmask]>:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >                              Thanks Winifred and Bridget: The questions
> you raise are important.
> > Below I
> > >
> > >
> > >                             offer some suggestions, but also ask that
> others chime in. The
> > questions:
> > >
> > >
> > >                             More questions for the group:     1.     
> About  the discussions /
> > blogs:
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Thanks Bridget, I'm totally with you!  My
> class will also be discussing:
> > >
> > >
> > >                             environment; food and water; sexual / GLBT
> rights; racial apartheid;
> > human
> > >
> > >
> > >                             rights activism.  Rodney:  should we just add
> new "Discussion" groups
> > for each
> > >
> > >
> > >                             of these topics?  And how about adding
> discussions for the wonderful
> > topics
> > >
> > >
> > >                             that are in the syllabus (under "blog posts"):
> defining globalization,
> > social
> > >
> > >
> > >                             justice, and human rights.  (Maybe you've
> already started to do this?)
> > Yes, I
> > >
> > >
> > >                             am setting up Discussions (under Forums) for
> each of these as
> > categories.
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Please go to the Forums tab on our NING page,
> then look to the right of
> > the
> > >
> > >
> > >                             window that opens up, you will see a pull down
> tab for Discussions, and
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Categories.  Pull down tab for Categories. 
> There you will see each of
> > the
> > >
> > >
> > >                             topics as identified as Blogs on our Syllabus.
> I have only made
> > Categories
> > >
> > >
> > >                             for the first set of topics for our syllabus
> (i.e. Globalization, Social
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Justice and Human rights). Under each
> Category, please create a
> > discussion
> > >
> > >
> > >                             link for your institution.  I have already
> created one for Miami
> > Students.
> > >
> > >
> > >                             This will allow  us to track discussions by
> content area and by
> > Institution.
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Students can then post responses to a specific
> discussion area and
> > specific
> > >
> > >
> > >                             institution. This allows also for
> accountability.     2.  As for the
> > student
> > >
> > >
> > >                             accountability issue, it would be great if
> there was some feature on
> > Ning that
> > >
> > >
> > >                             would let faculty see all the posts for a
> given student.  If that's not
> > >
> > >
> > >                             possible, I was thinking I might ask my
> students to print out their
> > posts and
> > >
> > >
> > >                             comments each week and turn them in.  Yes, you
> can see the threads, but
> > this
> > >
> > >
> > >                             may be a bit tedious.  There is no central way
> to access all students
> > threads,
> > >
> > >
> > >                             but you can click on the student members name
> and get a listing of all
> > their
> > >
> > >
> > >                             postings (I am not sure if this requires
> administrator's privileges, if
> > so,
> > >
> > >
> > >                             let me know and I will designate this for each
> Partner.)
> > >
> > >
> > >                             3.  Can I belabor the point about organizing
> the projects some more?
> > (Sorry
> > >
> > >
> > >                             to be a pest, but I'm not getting how this
> will work, and my course
> > starts
> > >
> > >
> > >                             soon so I need to be able to explain it to my
> students!)  Rodney, how
> > should
> > >
> > >
> > >                             we assign students to teams?  Is this
> something you wanted to do
> > yourself?  Or
> > >
> > >
> > >                             should we ask for a volunteer?  It seems like
> this is a task that needs
> > to be
> > >
> > >
> > >                             centralized somehow.  If we are doing this
> top-down approach, can I
> > suggest
> > >
> > >
> > >                             that we start it soon?    This is critical. 
> No I did not want to do
> > this
> > >
> > >
> > >                             myself.  I suggest that we ask for a volunteer
> to make sure that it gets
> > >
> > >
> > >                             done.  We can use the levels of Participation
> spread sheet to first
> > identify
> > >
> > >
> > >                             faculty.  Then we can set up a group for each
> set  -case studies and
> > service
> > >
> > >
> > >                             learning which includes each set of Partners. 
> Then they can choose a
> > >
> > >
> > >                             coordinator or a process which will streamline
> this process.    Or, are
> > >
> > >
> > >                             faculty already linking up with other schools
> on their own?  I couldn't
> > tell
> > >
> > >
> > >                             if this was going on in the comments ....     
> I'm thinking that given
> > the
> > >
> > >
> > >                             extreme fluidity of this context (varying
> start and stop dates for
> > courses,
> > >
> > >
> > >                             uncertain final enrollments for courses,
> etc.), it might make more sense
> > to
> > >
> > >
> > >                             set up groups online, and let students join as
> they become members.  For
> > >
> > >
> > >                             instance, we could start a thread for "case
> study projects" and students
> > can
> > >
> > >
> > >                             propose a topic -- as soon as two other
> students join, the group would
> > be on
> > >
> > >
> > >                             its way.  Better ideas welcome!!!!   Yes..see
> above.    4.  What is the
> > >
> > >
> > >                             "huddle workspace" on the webpage?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Huddle workspace on the webpage allows you to
> upload documents that can
> > be
> > >
> > >
> > >                             shared with other members as you choose.  I
> think that each partner can
> > set up
> > >
> > >
> > >                             such a workspace, but this is something I just
> discovered, and am not
> > sure how
> > >
> > >
> > >                             much total space we can have.  Right now it is
> 100 megs.  I think
> > Bridget set
> > >
> > >
> > >                             up one for her institution, and it has another
> 100 mgs.  Check it out,
> > it is
> > >
> > >
> > >                             really cool.  It's like a digital drop box.  I
> imagine students can use
> > this,
> > >
> > >
> > >                             or other online sites (like google docs) to
> help organize their group
> > >
> > >
> > >                             projects.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >                             winnie
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >                             thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Rodney c..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Sent from my BlackBerry device from Cincinnati
> Bell
> > >
> > >
> > >                             Wireless
> > >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2