For the same reason that the Cardinal is still running two years behind, I
suspect. Volunteers are involved.
Cheers,
Bob
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 1:12 PM, John Herman <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why it takes the ebird reviewer one year +
> to review a submitted record? I could see, on rare occasions, where a
> record needs to be submitted to experts for their input. But a Richland
> County record of a March 2013 Brewer's blackbird, submitted by someone
> other than myself, still remains to be decided upon. No phorto.s were taken
> of the Brewer's and the reviewer had all the documentation soon after the
> sighting. So what can be added to this record, seen by one person, than
> what is already known? A very late May 2013 red-throated loon record still
> remains undecided on.
> Maybe ebird needs to consider changing their review process, possibly
> adding another person to share the load.
> Good birding,
> J. P. Herman
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> Ohio-birds mailing list, a service of the Ohio Ornithological Society.
> Our thanks to Miami University for hosting this mailing list.
> Additional discussions can be found in our forums, at
> www.ohiobirds.org/forum/.
>
> You can join or leave the list, or change your options, at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=OHIO-BIRDS
> Send questions or comments about the list to: [log in to unmask]
>
--
Robert D Powell
Congress Farm Research Institute
Wilmington, OH, USA
[log in to unmask]
Nulla dies sine aves
______________________________________________________________________
Ohio-birds mailing list, a service of the Ohio Ornithological Society.
Our thanks to Miami University for hosting this mailing list.
Additional discussions can be found in our forums, at www.ohiobirds.org/forum/.
You can join or leave the list, or change your options, at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=OHIO-BIRDS
Send questions or comments about the list to: [log in to unmask]
|
