I don't think I understand your point. Nobody gets "their" archival records accepted. Archival records are older records, from people who are not on eBird, which are well-documented, and which Vic has taken the time to enter into the database. There are lots more than he hasn't entered yet. I would think that getting the eBird list to match the official Ohio list would be a pretty low priority - that's not what eBird is about. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:39 PM, John Herman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I guess the species that are accepted for the ebird Ohio list depends on > who is reporting the species. Ebird reviewers have no problem getting their > archival records accepted, others not so much. Like someone said, it's > getting old, REALLY OLD. > Cheers, > John Herman > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Ohio-birds mailing list, a service of the Ohio Ornithological Society. > Please consider joining our Society, at > www.ohiobirds.org/site/membership.php. > Our thanks to Miami University for hosting this mailing list. > > > You can join or leave the list, or change your options, at: > listserv.miamioh.edu/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=OHIO-BIRDS > Send questions or comments about the list to: [log in to unmask] > -- Ned Keller ______________________________________________________________________ Ohio-birds mailing list, a service of the Ohio Ornithological Society. Please consider joining our Society, at www.ohiobirds.org/site/membership.php. Our thanks to Miami University for hosting this mailing list. You can join or leave the list, or change your options, at: listserv.miamioh.edu/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=OHIO-BIRDS Send questions or comments about the list to: [log in to unmask]