Here are some primary materials that I just found in a box:
Unsigned. "Murder" by Poison Bootleg Liquor. The Literary Digest
(January 15, 1927), 5-7. This includes paragraphs from a variety of
papers on the subject, and it could be used to round up the coverage
of what appears to be a big story in early 1927. From paragraph 2:
"Poison liquor consumed in 1926 claimed the startling toll of 2,903
deaths in eighteen States of the Union, according to the New York
American, which explains that these figures are necessarily
incomplete."
The Literary Digest for February 26, 1927, p. 14, covers "Dr.
Norris's Poison Liquor Report." Apparently the Chief Medical
Inspector of New York, Charles G. Norris, was regarded as quite the
wet. The same report was covered on page 23 of the May 28, 1927
issue. On March 3, 1928, the Literary Digest covered a different
report by an Iowa pharmacologist on bootleg poison on page 21.
Within a year, the drys had their own reports debunking the claim
that many died from poison liquor. The New England Journal of
Medicine ran three reports to lead the March 22, 1928 issue (vol 198,
no. 5, pp. 227-234). Each concluded that the illicit alcohol
contained nothing more toxic than the usual ethyl alcohol. This
echoed the dry response to Norris's report - "How can you poison
poison?" - with scientific support. They were by George H. Bigelow,
Hermann C. Lythgoe, and Reid Hunt and titled, respectively, "Are
'Alcohol Deaths Due to Alcohol?," "The Character of the Illicit
Liquor upon the Massachusetts Market," and "An Examination of the
Toxicity of One Hundred Samples of Illicit Liquor."
Another good source for Prohibition-era reports and claims about the
nastiness of bootleg liquor would be the American Mercury, which
often featured essays and stories in which characters procured
illicit drink.
Jon
--
Jon Miller, Asst. Prof. of English, Dept. of English, Univ. of Akron,
Akron, OH 44302. office and voice mail, 1-330-972-5717.
|