I don't think I understand your point. Nobody gets "their" archival records
accepted. Archival records are older records, from people who are not on
eBird, which are well-documented, and which Vic has taken the time to enter
into the database. There are lots more than he hasn't entered yet. I would
think that getting the eBird list to match the official Ohio list would be
a pretty low priority - that's not what eBird is about.

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:39 PM, John Herman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I guess the species that are accepted for the ebird Ohio list depends on
> who is reporting the species. Ebird reviewers have no problem getting their
> archival records accepted, others not so much. Like someone said, it's
> getting old, REALLY OLD.
> Cheers,
> John Herman
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> Ohio-birds mailing list, a service of the Ohio Ornithological Society.
> Please consider joining our Society, at
> www.ohiobirds.org/site/membership.php.
> Our thanks to Miami University for hosting this mailing list.
>
>
> You can join or leave the list, or change your options, at:
> listserv.miamioh.edu/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=OHIO-BIRDS
> Send questions or comments about the list to: [log in to unmask]
>



--
Ned Keller

______________________________________________________________________

Ohio-birds mailing list, a service of the Ohio Ornithological Society.
Please consider joining our Society, at www.ohiobirds.org/site/membership.php.
Our thanks to Miami University for hosting this mailing list.


You can join or leave the list, or change your options, at:
listserv.miamioh.edu/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=OHIO-BIRDS
Send questions or comments about the list to: [log in to unmask]